Herpes Stigma: the Origin

On August 31, 2012, in Blog, FAQ, by Admin



  • Herpes Stigma: the Origin

    1960′s

    It wasn’t until the 1960′s that Herpes Simplex Virus was divided into Type 1 and Type 2, for medical/scientific purposes.  Until then, there was just Herpes Simplex Virus.  Unfortunately, this would later develop into the myth of “good herpes” and “bad herpes”.

    [Note:  Oral & Genital Herpes have no specific type; either location can host either Type 1 or Type 2... either of which can also infect any other surface of the body]

    1970′s

    The herpes stigma is a comparatively recent phenomenon and appears the direct result, many claim, of a Burroughs Wellcome pharmaceutical marketing campaign in the late 1970′s through mid 1980′s.  Prior to the development of antiviral drugs, cold sores and genital herpes (both caused by either of the herpes simplex viruses) were only treated symptomatically – symptoms could be alleviated but not prevented (and obviously, the viruses could not be eradicated from the body; they still cannot). Neither condition was considered to be a significant medical problem – a standard medical textbook such as Obstetric and Gynecological Nursing by Rosemary E Bailey, 1978 edition, did not even bother mentioning herpes.

    A 1975 study of “Psychological morbidity in a clinic for sexually transmitted disease” (Richard Mayou, The London Hospital).[1] In the Journal of Clinical Investigation,[2] Pedro Cuatrecasas stated, “during the R&D of acyclovir (Zovirax), marketing [department of Burroughs Wellcome] insisted that there were ‘no markets’ for this compound. Most had hardly heard of genital herpes…” Thus marketing the medical condition – separating the ‘normal cold sore’ from the ‘stigmatized genital infection’ was to become the key to marketing the drug, a process now known as ‘disease mongering’.[3]

    In the USA, prescription drugs can be advertised directly to the public. The Burroughs Wellcome advertising campaign was designed to stimulate demand for Zovirax by raising patients’ concern about the social consequences of infection and emphasizing that the drug could reduce outbreaks and transmission. The campaign created the stigma which has clung to genital herpes ever since.[4][5][6]

    Today

    It is conjectured by much of the HSV community that the reason for lack of the same level of stigma in many non-English speaking countries is that, in many languages, the word ‘herpes’ is used for ‘cold sores’.  That while Herpes Simplex was divided into 2 categories scientifically in the 1960′s, it was never divided socially and “relabeled”, with the associated stigma.  Therefore, when a genital infection is labeled ‘herpes’, the link to cold sores is made. This makes it less likely that the patient will be alarmed by the diagnosis.  Another key indicator is that the stigma is much stronger in the societies where the Burroughs Wellcome marketing/advertising campaigns actually occurred in the 1970′s & 1980′s.

    Either way, in most of the world, getting herpes is about as significant as getting the flu.  We’re human.  We get sick now and then.


    Ed. Note:

    While it may not sound like it, we make no judgments about the “goodness” or “badness” of the actions above.  It’s marketing. Convincing people that they want/need things is every marketer’s job and every company does it.  Herpes has always been an inconvenient (and for some, uncomfortable) fact of human life.   Burroughs Wellcome simply discovered a means of additional symptomatic relief and, like any other manufacturer, sought to ensure there were plenty of people to buy it.  That’s the whole purpose of marketing.   And, since its release, Burroughs Wellcome’s Zovirax(acyclovir) has certainly provided many millions with additional relief from various complications caused by viruses.


    References:

    1. ^ British Journal of Venereal Disease 1975 ["http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1045113/pdf]
    2. ^ Journal of Clinical Investigation ["http://www.jci.org/articles/view/29999]
    3. ^ R Moynihansee Selling Sickness: The Pharmaceutical Industry and Disease Mongering. BMJ 2002
    4. ^ Time magazine August 1982 cover ["http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19820802,00.html]
    5. ^ Time magazine August 1982 “New Scarlet Letter” ["http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1715020,00.html]
    6. ^ Time magazine August 1982 “Behaviour: Battling an Elusive Invader” ["http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,925609,00.html]
     

    Join Team H!

    Race for Awareness
    (click the pic to learn more)

    ProjectAccept.org on Facebook

    Share your H Story

    Share your story and help us declare checkmate on STDs! (you can remain as anonymous as you'd like)

    Click here to begin!

    Site Notices

    © 2012 ProjectAccept.org (some images copyright (c) 123RF Stock Photos)

    Public Notice: ProjectAccept.org - a Virginia Non-Stock Corporation, holding 501c3 non-profit (charity) status with the US government. To view our listing on IRS.gov, click here.

    Please see "About" for timeline & milestones.